Moldovan election wasn’t ‘free or fair’ – Kremlin
The Kremlin has refused to fully acknowledge that Maia Sandu won last weekend’s Moldovan presidential election, asserting that the electoral process was neither fair nor democratic.
Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Sandu cannot be seen as the legitimate holder of the office, emphasizing that “the majority of people within Moldova itself did not vote for her.”
Peskov criticized the Moldovan electoral framework, pointing to what he described as significant procedural irregularities that hindered the voting rights of its citizens residing in Russia.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova has highlighted that despite an estimated 500,000 Moldovans living in Russia, only a handful of polling stations were made available to them. In contrast, over 200 polling sites were set up in Western states, which allowed for much higher voter accessibility among the diaspora there.
This disparity, according to Peskov, “compromises the transparency” of the vote and raises questions about its legitimacy.
“As for Mrs. Sandu,” Peskov commented, “we believe she is not the legitimate president of her country, as most of the population within Moldova did not vote for her.” He emphasized that Moscow officials could objectively assess the elections based on the experiences of Russian-based Moldovans who were effectively barred from voting, concluding that these restrictions mean the “elections were neither democratic nor fair.”
Peskov also criticized the current Moldovan leadership, accusing it of taking an unfriendly stance towards Russia and marginalizing Russian media within the country, which he claimed represents “a direct restriction of citizens’ rights to access diverse information sources.” Moldovan authorities had “sterilized the information field,” he added, and suppressed alternative viewpoints.
Beyond the election concerns, Peskov addressed tensions in Transnistria, a region within Moldova with a predominantly Russian-speaking population that has historically maintained close ties with Moscow. He suggested that residents of Transnistria do not align with Sandu’s administration, saying, “They are not inclined to support the current leadership of Moldova.”
He characterized the situation as a “serious issue” that requires a “constructive approach” that, he argued, the Moldovan leadership currently lacks.
The Moldovan Central Election Commission declared Sandu the victor of the election, with official results showing her winning 55.33% of the votes to her competitor Alexander Stoyanoglo’s 44.67%. However, data from the Moldovan election authority indicates that Sandu received only 48.81% of the vote within Moldova itself, while her opponent gathered a slightly higher share, at 51.19%.
Additionally, Zakharova echoed Peskov’s concerns, alleging widespread fraud in the voting process, which, she argued, further undermines the legitimacy of Sandu’s presidency.
